Category Archives: Wage and Overtime Pay

States Continue To Pass Equal Pay Legislation

While the Federal Equal Pay Act, which mandates employers to pay men and women the same pay for the same work, has been the law for 55 years, salary surveys continue to show that women are paid less than men.  In an effort to address this pay gap, states around the country are passing their own legislation.  Some of the states have enacted similar provisions, while a few have enacted unique provisions. Ban On Salary History Inquiries Studies have shown that one factor contributing to ongoing pay discrepancies is that an employee’s starting salary with an employer is often based …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

So You Think You’ve Got Independent Contractors? Well, Think Again

Virginia law requires most employers to carry workers’ compensation insurance in order to provide specific benefits to workers injured during the course of their work and to provide employers with protection from civil suits for those work-related injuries. Generally, an employer with more than three employees is required to carry workers’ compensation coverage. However, in the last decade especially, employers have more frequently misclassified employees as independent contractors in an effort to keep the number of employees below three and to avoid purchasing workers’ compensation coverage.

The Tip Income Protection Act — Changes to Tip Pooling

The Tip Income Protection Act of 2018 (“the Act”) was signed into law on March 23, 2018 as part of the omnibus spending bill. The Act, buried in the 2,323 pages of the bill, amends the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and rolls back the Department of Labor’s 2011 regulation on tip pools. The Act allows for employees who do not customarily receive tips to participate in tip pools, where the employer does not take a tip credit. The “employees” referred to in this act also include the back of the house employees like busboys, chefs, line cooks, and janitors. …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

SCOTUS Update: DOL Rule Reversal to Impact “Narrowly Construed” FLSA Class Exemptions

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that automobile service advisors are exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. While the decision would appear to apply only to a narrow class of employers (automobile dealers), the majority opinion rejected the principle that exemptions to the FLSA should be construed narrowly, which has the potential for much broader impact. Encino Motorcars v Navarro involved an exemption under the FLSA which provides that that statute’s overtime-pay requirement does not apply to “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles . . …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

DOL Announces PAID – the Pros and Cons of the Wage and Hour Self-Audit

Double (liquidated) damages and attorneys’ fees are often the tail that wags the settlement dog in government audits and wage and hour litigation.  Employers now have another strategy for dealing with unintentional wage and hour pay errors – but only on a trial basis. On March 6, 2018, the United States Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (WHD) announced a national pilot program for employer self-audit of wage and hour violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal statute that governs payment of minimum wage and overtime pay for nonexempt employees.  The program, aptly …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

Cash Payments Made To Employees In Lieu Of Health Benefits Must Be Factored Into Overtime Pay Under The FLSA

In Flores v. City of San Gabriel, the Ninth Circuit held that cash payments made by the City to its employees in lieu of healthcare benefits must be factored into the base pay that is used to calculate overtime pay (1.5 times base pay). The City provided a “Flexible Benefits Plan” to its employees, under which it gave employees a designated monetary amount to aid in the purchase of healthcare (vision, dental, and medical) benefits. Employees had the choice to obtain medical benefits through the City or receive cash instead. The cash was added to the employees’ paychecks as a …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

DOL Adopts “Primary Beneficiary” Test for Interns

The U.S. Department of Labor announced Friday that it was abandoning the six-factor test it had previously used for determining whether interns are employees for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and that it was now adopting the “primary beneficiary” test favored by several U.S. Courts of Appeals. As we discussed recently, the Second Circuit in Wang v. The Hearst Corporation, No. 16‐3302 (2d Cir. Dec. 8, 2017), and the Ninth Circuit in Benjamin v. B&H Education, No. 15-17147 (9th Cir. Dec. 19, 2017), had recently rejected the DOL’s six-factor test in favor of the “primary beneficiary” test, which …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

New Guidance on Interns v. Employees

The test for determining whether unpaid interns at a for-profit employer are employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and thus entitled to compensation for services provided, has been the subject of considerable litigation over the past few years. Employers now have recent guidance from two federal appellate courts to use in analyzing their intern programs. In Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., Nos. 13‐4478; 13‐4481 (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2016), the Second Circuit (which covers district courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont) explained that, in determining whether an individual is an intern or employee, the salient question is …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

Workplace Now: The “Localization” of Employment Law – What you Don’t Know Can Hurt

It is no secret these days that many workforces, particularly over the last five years, are now subject to numerous state and municipal laws that seek to shape and regulate numerous areas of the workplace (many of which are often conflicting) .  Given the gridlock that has been in place for almost a decade in Congress, state legislatures and cities have accelerated their oversight of employers and have imposed their own laws. In fact, there are literally hundreds of examples of how the scope of local regulation has changed, but perhaps the most breath-taking took place this year in the …

[ CONTINUE READING ]

$47,476 Exempt Salary Level Struck Down

Yesterday, a Texas Federal Judge invalidated the Obama era’s overtime Final Rule which attempted to raise the salary level threshold required to qualify for the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) “white collar” exemptions to $47,476 per year.  The last year has been a rollercoaster ride for employers working to comply with the proposed doubling of the salary level and to manage labor costs.  For now, the salary basis for “white collar” exemption will remain $455 per week — or $23,660 per year. “The department has exceeded its authority and gone too far with the final rule,” Judge Mazzant said. “Because …

[ CONTINUE READING ]